{"id":579,"date":"2011-05-15T13:16:12","date_gmt":"2011-05-15T18:16:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/johnstrawn.com\/?p=579"},"modified":"2011-05-16T11:30:41","modified_gmt":"2011-05-16T16:30:41","slug":"the-myth-of-course-obsolescence-and-non-conforming-equipment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/golf\/personalities\/579\/the-myth-of-course-obsolescence-and-non-conforming-equipment","title":{"rendered":"The Myth of Course Obsolescence and the Influence of Non-conforming Equipment"},"content":{"rendered":"

My next door neighbor\/brother-in-law\/Luckiest Man in the World<\/a>\/the new Nostradamus<\/a>, Lee Barrett, poked his head in the door this morning a little before 7:00 to share his latest grievance with a world gone sour.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>

Would You Buy a Used Golf Ball from this Man?<\/p><\/div>\n

\u201cYou know about golf courses,\u201d he begins, so I know he\u2019s about to tell me something he expects me to agree with.\u00a0 \u201cWhen was the last time you\u2019ve seen or heard about an \u2018obsolete\u2019 course?\u201d<\/p>\n

What\u2019s got him started this morning is a letter to the editor in the New York Times<\/em>, prompted by an article by Bill Pennington in the May 9th issue<\/a>, about the Polara golf ball<\/a>, which \u201cis designed to reduce slices and hooks by 75 percent or more\u2026.\u201d\u2014nirvana<\/em>, Pennington notes, for the hacker who is indifferent to the USGA\u2019s stringent rules about conforming equipment.\u00a0\u00a0 Pennington found plenty of golfers willing to admit that they would happily play the Polara if it would help them hit the ball straighter.<\/p>\n

When the Polara first came on the market in the 1970s, the USGA tested it and found that the ball\u2019s irregular dimple pattern really did correct hooks and slices.\u00a0 The USGA \u201crefused to approve the ball for tournament play,\u201d according to Polara\u2019s website, \u201cruling that it would \u2018reduce the skill required to play golf\u2019.\u201d\u00a0 \u00a0Duh.<\/p>\n

But of course the USGA has no right to prohibit Polara\u2019s sale.\u00a0\u00a0 It could keep it out of competitions sanctioned by the USGA, but not prohibit its use among casual players who are not ideological disciples of approved and proper golf. \u00a0So thirty years later the forbidden Polara ball is still finding its way onto the course, a career desperado with a chip on its shoulder.<\/p>\n

The correspondent to the Times who kick-started Lee\u2019s morning rant took up a cause that\u2019s percolated among golf purists looking for a way to arrest the pace of technological improvement in equipment for years: require a single conforming ball for tournament play.\u00a0\u00a0 Baseball and basketball have a conforming ball standard, the letter notes, as do most sports.\u00a0 Nike and Adidas both make soccer balls, but Nike can\u2019t claim its ball bends better.\u00a0 Its performance characteristics are prescribed and immutable (except perhaps for durability.)<\/p>\n

But that\u2019s not what set Lee off.\u00a0\u00a0 Because the new clubs and balls which do conform still help players hit it longer and straighter, the letter asserted \u201cthat historic courses have been rendered obsolete.\u201d<\/p>\n

How many courses did I know of, Lee demanded, that \u201chave been rendered obsolete?\u201d<\/p>\n

And of course there aren\u2019t many which come to mind.\u00a0 \u00a0Merion was once thought of as undersized, but will host the 2013 US Open, playing to a par 70 at around 6,800 yards.\u00a0 (Part of Merion\u2019s problem was how to accommodate the large galleries who love to walk the Open courses,not simply its length.)<\/p>\n

And length is far from the only defense a golf course can mount against low scores anyway.\u00a0 Strategy\u2014from exacting bunker placements to complex (and not necessarily simply fiendishly sloped) greens to treacherous rough\u2014can force a more complex set of challenges into a golfer\u2019s cranium than the expectation of an endless series of 300 yard drives ever could.<\/p>\n

So the \u201ctechnological \u2018arms race\u2019\u201d the letter to the Times laments has, quite to the contrary, allowed more players to enjoy the game, even if it\u2019s extremely unlikely that any of them will ever play at an elite level.\u00a0 I\u2019m using the best equipment I can lay my hands on, and Lee spent a significant portion of the largess the government doles out to him annually to get fitted with a whole bag full of game improving PINGS last year, and it\u2019s still a moment for great celebration when either of us breaks 80 from the white tees on a run-of-the mill, no rough, few hazards, flat greens, state-of-the-art, no forced-carries golf course.<\/p>\n

Obsolescence of courses today is less an issue in the golf industry than the disappearance altogether of a regrettably large number of courses that are just not economically viable.<\/p>\n

Think about this: supposedly there are about 25 million golfers in the US.\u00a0 This pretty much counts anyone who\u2019s held a club in his or her hands over the last twelve months.\u00a0 If you play one round a year you\u2019re a \u201cgolfer.\u201d\u00a0 (That\u2019s like saying if you have one drink you\u2019re an alcoholic.)<\/p>\n

But only about 4.5 million golfers carry handicaps\u2014that is, take their hobby seriously enough to post scores and engineer their bets based on something more than deceit or desire.\u00a0\u00a0 That\u2019s the number we should be trying to pump up, and not by making courses harder but by making the game more fun\u2014even if it means constantly challenging the standards for conforming equipment, with Nike and Taylor Made and Titliest and PING and Callaway competing endlessly to make that magic wand that every golfer must have in his bag.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My next door neighbor\/brother-in-law\/Luckiest Man in the World\/the new Nostradamus, Lee Barrett, poked his head in the door this morning… Read more »<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":581,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,9,18,17,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-579","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-golf-course-architecture","category-golf","category-lifestyle","category-courses-and-travel","category-personalities"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2011\/05\/I-phone-misc-052.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=579"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":592,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/579\/revisions\/592"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/581"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=579"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=579"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/theaposition.com\/johnstrawn\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=579"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}